Emergency Department Revisits Research Articles

Lactate Levels as a Predictor of Emergency Department Revisits in Infants With Acute Bronchiolitis.

This study aimed to identify predictive biomarkers for unscheduled emergency department (ED) revisits within 24 hours of discharge in infants diagnosed with acute bronchiolitis (AB). A retrospective observational study was conducted on infants diagnosed with AB who visited 3 emergency medical centers between January 2020 and December 2022. The study excluded infants with comorbidities, congenital diseases, and prematurity and infants who revisited the ED after 24 hours of discharge. Demographic data, vital signs, and laboratory results were collected from the medical records. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed on factors with P of less than 0.1 in univariable analysis. Receiver operator curve analysis was used to assess the accuracy of lactate measurements in predicting ED revisits within 24 hours of discharge. Out of 172 participants, 100 were in the revisit group and 72 in the discharge group. The revisit group was significantly younger and exhibited higher lactate levels, lower pH values, and higher pCO2 levels compared to the discharge group. Univariable logistic regression identified several factors associated with revisits. Multivariable analysis found that only lactate was a variable correlated with predicting ED revisits (odds ratio, 18.020; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.764-56.334). The receiver operator curve analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.856, with an optimal lactate cutoff value of 2.15. Lactate value in infants diagnosed with AB were identified as a potential indicator of predicting unscheduled ED revisits within 24 hours of discharge. The predictive potential of lactate levels holds promise for enhancing prognosis prediction, reducing health care costs, and alleviating ED overcrowding. However, given the study's limitations, a more comprehensive prospective investigation is recommended to validate these findings.

Antibiotic route and outcomes for children hospitalized with pneumonia.

Emerging evidence suggests that initial oral and intravenous (IV) antibiotics have similar efficacy in pediatric community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), but further data are needed. We determined the association between hospital-level initial oral antibiotic rates and outcomes in pediatric CAP. This retrospective cohort study included children hospitalized with CAP at 43 hospitals in the Pediatric Health Information System (2016-2022). Hospitals were grouped by whether initial antibiotics were given orally in a high, moderate, or low proportion of patients. Regression models examined associations between high versus low oral-utilizing hospitals and length of stay (LOS, primary outcome), intensive care unit (ICU) transfers, escalated respiratory care, complicated CAP, cost, readmissions, and emergency department (ED) revisits. Initial oral antibiotics were used in 16% (interquartile range: 10%-20%) of 30,207 encounters, ranging from 1% to 68% across hospitals. Comparing high versus low oral-utilizing hospitals (oral rate: 32% [27%-47%] and 10% [9%-11%], respectively), there were no differences in LOS, intensive care unit, complicated CAP, cost, or ED revisits. Escalated respiratory care occurred in 1.3% and 0.5% of high and low oral-utilizing hospitals, respectively (relative ratio [RR]: 2.96 [1.12, 7.81]), and readmissions occurred in 1.5% and 0.8% (RR: 1.68 [1.31, 2.17]). Initial oral antibiotics varied across hospitals without a difference in LOS. While high oral-utilizing hospitals had higher escalated respiratory care and readmission rates, these were rare, the clinical significance of these small differences is uncertain, and there were no differences in other clinically relevant outcomes. This suggests some children may benefit from initial IV antibiotics, but most would probably do well with oral antibiotics.

Prediction of high-risk emergency department revisits from a machine-learning algorithm: a proof-of-concept study.

High-risk emergency department (ED) revisit is considered an important quality indicator that may reflect an increase in complications and medical burden. However, because of its multidimensional and highly complex nature, this factor has not been comprehensively investigated. This study aimed to predict high-risk ED revisit with a machine-learning (ML) approach. This 3-year retrospective cohort study assessed adult patients between January 2019 and December 2021 from National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch with high-risk ED revisit, defined as hospital or intensive care unit admission after ED return within 72 hours. A total of 150 features were preliminarily screened, and 79 were used in the prediction model. Deep learning, random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and stacked ensemble algorithm were used. The stacked ensemble model combined multiple ML models and performed model stacking as a meta-level algorithm. Confusion matrix, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were used to evaluate performance. Analysis was performed for 6282 eligible adult patients: 5025 (80.0%) in the training set and 1257 (20.0%) in the testing set. High-risk ED revisit occurred for 971 (19.3%) of training set patients vs 252 (20.1%) in the testing set. Leading predictors of high-risk ED revisit were age, systolic blood pressure and heart rate. The stacked ensemble model showed more favourable prediction performance (AUROC 0.82) than the other models: deep learning (0.69), random forest (0.78) and XGBoost (0.79). Also, the stacked ensemble model achieved favourable accuracy and specificity. The stacked ensemble algorithm exhibited better prediction performance in which the predictions were generated from different ML algorithms to optimally maximise the final set of results. Patients with older age and abnormal systolic blood pressure and heart rate at the index ED visit were vulnerable to high-risk ED revisit. Further studies should be conducted to externally validate the model.

Antihypertensive prescription is associated with improved 30-day outcomes for discharged hypertensive emergency department patients.

Hypertension (HTN) is common in discharged emergency department (ED) patients, yet the short-term outcomes of treating HTN at ED discharge are unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether emergency physician (EP) prescription of oral antihypertensive therapy at ED discharge for hypertensive patients is associated with a decreased 30-day risk of the severe adverse events (AEs), death, and revisits to the ED. We conducted an observational cohort study assessing the 30-day outcomes of discharged ED patients with HTN, comparing outcomes based on whether antihypertensive therapy was prescribed. All discharged adult ED patients from an eight-hospital system with a diagnosis of HTN from January 2016 to February 2020 were screened, and consisted of a mix of suburban and urban patients with broad ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds. Patients were categorized into the treatment group if they received a prescription for antihypertensive medication at ED discharge. The primary outcome was severe composite AEs from HTN (aortic catastrophe, heart failure, myocardial infarction, hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke, or hypertensive encephalopathy) within 30 days of ED discharge. The secondary outcomes were death or ED revisit over the same period. The study sample consisted of 93,512 ED visits; 57.5% were female, and mean age was 59.3 years. 4.7% of patients were prescribed antihypertensive treatment at ED discharge. Within 30 days, 0.7% of patients experienced an AE, 0.1% died, and 15.2% had an ED revisit. The treatment group had significantly lower odds of AE (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.224, 95%CI 0.106-0.416, p<0.001), and ED revisits (aOR: 0.610, 95%CI 0.547-0.678, p<0.001), adjusting for age, race, degree of HTN, ED treatment for elevated HTN, Elixhauser comorbidity index, and heart failure history. There was no difference in odds of death 30 days after discharge. Prescription antihypertensive therapy for discharged ED patients is associated with a 30-day decrease in severe adverse events and ED revisit rate.

Impact of Pharmacist Involvement in Post-Discharge Emergency Department Culture Review

Background: Many infectious diseases are diagnosed in emergency departments (ED) and patients are prescribed antimicrobial therapy. Results from cultures typically take a few days to become finalized. Following up on these results is necessary when medication changes are indicated due to results that show bacteria are resistant to the prescribed antibiotics. Involving pharmacists in assessing the culture and sensitivity results, and making interventions when needed, is an innovative way to ensure that patients receive appropriate antimicrobial therapy based on the culture and sensitivity data. This study analyzed the impact of pharmacist involvement in the ED’s post-discharge positive culture review process on ED re-visits and hospitalizations. Methods: This single-center, pre- and post-implementation study examined the impact of pharmacist involvement in the post-ED visit culture review process on ED re-visits and hospitalizations. Positive microbiological results included documented growth from urine, skin and soft tissue, throat, blood, or stool cultures. Patients included in the study were of 18 years of age or older and had a positive culture result post ED-discharge. Patients were excluded from the study if they were admitted to the hospital or transferred to another facility. The primary outcomes included ED re-visits within 7 days and hospital readmissions within 30 days for the same condition. The secondary outcomes were percentage of pharmacist interventions accepted and types of pharmacist interventions implemented. Results: A total of 141 patients were included in the study, with 65 in the pre-implementation group and 76 in the post-implementation group. The primary outcome of ED re-visits within 7 days for the same condition occurred in 11 (17%) patients in the pre-implementation group and 5 (7%) patients in the post-implementation group ( P = .0454). The primary outcome of hospitalizations within 30 days for the same condition occurred in 5 (8%) patients in the pre-implementation group and 1 (1%) patient in the post-implementation group ( P = .0137). Seventeen (94%) out of the 18 pharmacist interventions were accepted and implemented. The intervention types implemented were to recommend to: change antibiotic (35%), not initiate antibiotic (24%), initiate antibiotic (24%), and continue antibiotic (18%). Conclusion: Pharmacist involvement in the ED post-discharge positive culture review process showed a decrease in ED re-visits and hospitalizations for the same condition.

A mapping review of interventions to address patients who frequently seek care in the emergency department

BackgroundThe high utilization of acute care services, particularly emergency departments (ED), continues to be a significant concern for healthcare providers. Numerous approaches have been studied to meet the care needs of patients who frequently seek care in the ED; however, there is no comprehensive review of the current literature base. As such, a current understanding of the interventions initiated within the ED to address the needs of frequent users is required. This mapping review had three objectives: identify the characteristics associated with the need to frequently seek care in the ED; identify interventions implemented to address the needs of this population; and identify gaps in the current evidence base.MethodsA knowledge map was created by scoping the literature to identify characteristics associated with frequent ED use and interventions implemented to address frequent use. Then, a literature search was conducted to determine what has been implemented by EDs to reduce frequent ED use. The literature was searched from 2013 to January 2023. MeSH terms and keywords were used to identify relevant studies. Studies implementing an intervention for those with characteristics associated with frequent ED use and reporting on ED use were included.ResultsTwenty-three (23) controlled trials and 35 observational studies were included. The most common populations were older adults, those with chronic conditions, and generic “frequent users”. No studies assessed Indigenous Peoples or racial minorities, and few assessed patients with a disability or patients experiencing homelessness. The most common interventions were referrals, care plans, case management, care coordination, and follow-up phone calls. Most studies reported ED revisits, hospitalization, costs, length-of-stay, or outpatient utilization. Few assessed patient or staff perspectives. About one-third of studies (n = 24) reported significant reductions in ED revisits.ConclusionsSimilar interventions, mainly focused on care coordination and planning, have been implemented to address frequent use of the ED. There are still significant gaps in the populations that have been studied. Efforts now must be undertaken to study more diverse populations whose care needs are not being met elsewhere and thus frequent the ED often.

Unplanned revisits of older patients to the emergency department

IntroductionOlder patients currently represent up to 12%−24% of all emergency department (ED) visits. While increasing in number, they are also at high risk of revisits once discharged. The rate of ED revisits within 72 h is a key indicator of the quality of care in emergency medicine and varies between 1% and 15%. The reasons for ED revisits are natural course of illness, misdiagnosis, lack of homecare, and self-discharge against medical advice. However, the risk factors for ED revisits have not been fully investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the incidence of ED revisits and identify the risk factors for ED revisits within 72 h after ED discharge.MethodsIn this retrospective study, older patients (≥70 years) were consecutively enrolled if they presented with an Emergency Severity Index of 2 or 3 in a tertiary care ED in 2019, with discharge after the ED visit. The primary endpoint was the frequency of unplanned ED revisits within 72 h after ED discharge. The secondary endpoints were the reasons and potential risk factors for ED revisits. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used.ResultsA total of 592 older patients were enrolled, of whom 30 (5.1%) revisited the ED within 72 h. Gastrointestinal diagnosis [odds ratio (OR), 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04–8.2; p = 0.043) and nausea in particular (OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.3–9.4; p = 0.016) were significant risk factors for ED revisits. Furthermore, discharge against medical advice (OR, 5.6; 95% CI, 1.7–18.1; p = 0.004) and ED presentation during the night (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.2–6.1; p = 0.014) were significant risk factors for ED revisits within 72 h after discharge, respectively.ConclusionAlthough the frequency of ED revisits among older patients at 72 h after discharge tends to be low and most revisits were illness-related, all older patients need to be assessed for risk factors for ED revisits. Discharge should be carefully evaluated to improve patient safety and provide the best healthcare to this frail population.

Prediction of emergency department revisits among child and youth mental health outpatients using deep learning techniques

BackgroundThe proportion of Canadian youth seeking mental health support from an emergency department (ED) has risen in recent years. As EDs typically address urgent mental health crises, revisiting an ED may represent unmet mental health needs. Accurate ED revisit prediction could aid early intervention and ensure efficient healthcare resource allocation. We examine the potential increased accuracy and performance of graph neural network (GNN) machine learning models compared to recurrent neural network (RNN), and baseline conventional machine learning and regression models for predicting ED revisit in electronic health record (EHR) data.MethodsThis study used EHR data for children and youth aged 4–17 seeking services at McMaster Children’s Hospital’s Child and Youth Mental Health Program outpatient service to develop and evaluate GNN and RNN models to predict whether a child/youth with an ED visit had an ED revisit within 30 days. GNN and RNN models were developed and compared against conventional baseline models. Model performance for GNN, RNN, XGBoost, decision tree and logistic regression models was evaluated using F1 scores.ResultsThe GNN model outperformed the RNN model by an F1-score increase of 0.0511 and the best performing conventional machine learning model by an F1-score increase of 0.0470. Precision, recall, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and positive and negative predictive values showed that the GNN model performed the best, and the RNN model performed similarly to the XGBoost model. Performance increases were most noticeable for recall and negative predictive value than for precision and positive predictive value.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates the improved accuracy and potential utility of GNN models in predicting ED revisits among children and youth, although model performance may not be sufficient for clinical implementation. Given the improvements in recall and negative predictive value, GNN models should be further explored to develop algorithms that can inform clinical decision-making in ways that facilitate targeted interventions, optimize resource allocation, and improve outcomes for children and youth.

Unscheduled Emergency Department Revisits Within 48 Hours of Discharge.

This study aimed to analyze early revisits (within 48 hours of discharge) in an Emergency Department. Among the 178,295 visits, 11,686 were revisits, resulting in a rate of 6.55% (95%CI 6.43-6.67). A total of 1,410 revisits required hospitalization, and 252 were due to preventable errors (17.87%). These errors were mainly related to an inadequate therapeutic plan at discharge (47.22%), an incomplete diagnostic process (29.37%), and misdiagnoses (13.10%). These findings represent a technology-enabled clinical audit tool. Electronic Healthcare Records have the potential to: provide quality metrics of hospital performance, help to keep revisit rates updated (assessment through a real-time dashboard), and improve clinical management (by transparency initiatives about errors, and a supportive learning environment regarding lessons learned).

Short-term prognosis of polypharmacy in elderly patients treated in emergency departments: results from the EDEN project.

Polypharmacy is a growing phenomenon among elderly individuals. However, there is little information about the frequency of polypharmacy among the elderly population treated in emergency departments (EDs) and its prognostic effect. This study aims to determine the prevalence and short-term prognostic effect of polypharmacy in elderly patients treated in EDs. A retrospective analysis of the Emergency Department Elderly in Needs (EDEN) project's cohort was performed. This registry included all elderly patients who attended 52 Spanish EDs for any condition. Mild and severe polypharmacy was defined as the use of 5-9 drugs and ⩾10 drugs, respectively. The assessed outcomes were ED revisits, hospital readmissions, and mortality 30 days after discharge. Crude and adjusted logistic regression analyses, including the patient's comorbidities, were performed. A total of 25,557 patients were evaluated [mean age: 78 (IQR: 71-84) years]; 10,534 (41.2%) and 5678 (22.2%) patients presented with mild and severe polypharmacy, respectively. In the adjusted analysis, mild polypharmacy and severe polypharmacy were associated with an increase in ED revisits [odds ratio (OR) 1.13 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-1.23) and 1.38 (95% CI: 1.24-1.51)] and hospital readmissions [OR 1.18 (95% CI: 1.04-1.35) and 1.36 (95% CI: 1.16-1.60)], respectively, compared to non-polypharmacy. Mild and severe polypharmacy were not associated with increased 30-day mortality [OR 1.05 (95% CI: 0.89-2.26) and OR 0.89 (95% CI: 0.72-1.12)], respectively. Polypharmacy was common among the elderly treated in EDs and associated with increased risks of ED revisits and hospital readmissions ⩽30 days but not with an increased risk of 30-day mortality. Patients with polypharmacy had a higher risk of ED revisits and hospital readmissions ⩽30 days after discharge.

Association between language discordance and unplanned hospital readmissions or emergency department revisits: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and objectiveStudies conflict about whether language discordance increases rates of hospital readmissions or emergency department (ED) revisits for adult and paediatric patients. The literature was systematically reviewed to investigate...

Referral of community-dwelling older adults from eight emergency departments in Canada: A secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from the interRAI multinational emergency department (ED) cohort study

Background: Emergency Department (ED) overcrowding, unnecessary hospitalization, and alternate level of care has been identified as a major issue in Canada and around the world. This problem especially impacts older adult populations, who are at elevated risk of functional decline and adverse events in hospital-centric systems. This study uses data from the interRAI ED Contact Assessment (ED-CA)[1], a comprehensive geriatric assessment used in the ED, to improve our understanding of ED systems of referral to community resources.&#x0D; Target Audience: ED staff in clinical and leadership positions interested in better understanding community referral processes to improve care for community-dwelling older adults.&#x0D; Methods: This study is a secondary analysis of cross-sectional Canadian data from a cohort study of elderly ED patients. The cohort of community-dwelling patients aged 65 and older presented to the ED between April 2017 and July 2018. They were screened and recruited in 10 EDs across Ontario, Quebec, and Newfoundland. The data were analyzed using frequency and logistic regression analyses, then the results were interpreted in collaboration with two geriatricians and one physiotherapist.&#x0D; What was done: This study explored referral patterns and identified predictors of referral from the ED to five different community health services (occupational therapy, physiotherapy, home care, social work, and/or specialized geriatric services) for supporting community-dwelling older adults. &#x0D; Results: We found that the sample (n=1055) was frail, with high needs and a high risk of ED revisit and institutionalization. Over half of the sample was referred to home care, occupational therapy, and/or physiotherapy, while only 16% were referred to specialized geriatric services. Most patients received multiple referrals from the ED. Province was the most impactful predictor for referral to occupational therapy or physiotherapy (OR for Ontario vs. Quebec=62.12, 95% CI [19.04, 202.70]) and home care (OR for Ontario vs. Quebec=12.09, 95% CI [5.81, 25.17]), while having an unstable condition was the most impactful predictor for social work referral (OR=5.51, 95% CI [3.78, 8.02]) and weight loss was the most impactful predictor for specialized geriatric service referral (OR=8.13, 95% CI [5.49, 12.04]). Other notable predictors included having overwhelmed family members, self-rated health, and having had a fall in the last 90 days.&#x0D; Key Learnings: Occupational therapy, physiotherapy, home care, social work, and specialized geriatric services are distinct services, specialized in addressing a specific set of care needs. We learned that specialized geriatric services are underutilized and may be poorly understood.&#x0D; Next Steps: To improve the quality of ED care, we have provided recommendations for restructuring care processes to promote shifts in clinical culture, evidence-informed decision-making, and proactive referral to community health services.&#x0D;

Clinical and economic impact of partnered pharmacist medication charting in the emergency department.

Introduction: Partnered pharmacist medication charting (PPMC), a process redesign hypothesised to improve medication safety and interdisciplinary collaboration, was trialed in a tertiary hospital's emergency department (ED). Objective: To evaluate the health-related impact and economic benefit of PPMC. Methods: A pragmatic, controlled study compared PPMC to usual care in the ED. PPMC included a pharmacist-documented best-possible medication history (BPMH), followed by a clinical conversation between a pharmacist and a medical officer to jointly develop a treatment plan and chart medications. Usual care included medical officer-led traditional medication charting in the ED, without a pharmacist-obtained BPMH or clinical conversation. Outcome measures, assessed after propensity score matching, were length of hospital or ED stay, relative stay index (RSI), in-hospital mortality, 30-day hospital readmissions or ED revisits, and cost. Results: A total of 309 matched pairs were analysed. The median RSI was reduced by 15.4% with PPMC (p = 0.029). There were no significant differences between the groups in the median length of ED stay (8 vs. 10h, p = 0.52), in-hospital mortality (1.3% vs. 1.3%, p > 0.99), 30-day readmission rates (21% vs. 17%; p = 0.35) and 30-day ED revisit rates (21% vs. 19%; p = 0.68). The hospital spent approximately $138.4 for the cost of PPMC care per patient to avert at least one medication error bearing high/extreme risk. PPMC saved approximately $1269 on the average cost of each admission. Conclusion: Implementing the ED-based PPMC model was associated with a significantly reduced RSI and admission costs, but did not affect clinical outcomes, noting that there was an additional focus on medication reconciliation in the usual care group relative to current practice at our study site.

Influence of type of household on prognosis at one year in patients ≥65years attending hospital emergency departments in Spain. The EDEN-6 study.

To investigate whether the type of household is associated with prognosis at one year in patients ≥65years of age discharged after medical consultation requiring emergency department care. Data from the Emergency Department and Elder Needs (EDEN) cohort were used. This retrospective cohort included all patients ≥65years of age seen in 52 Spanish emergency departments over one week (April 1-7, 2019) in whom the type of household was recorded and categorized as living at home alone, with relatives, with professional caregivers, or in a nursing home. Patient demographic and other baseline characteristics and management during the index emergency department episode were recorded and used to adjust the following 1-year outcomes: all-cause mortality, hospitalization and emergency department revisit. Associations between type of household and outcomes are expressed as adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals using living alone as the reference category. 13,442 patients with a median age of 79years (interquartile range 72-86) were included; 56% were women, 12.2% of patients lived alone, 74.9% with relatives, 3.9% with a professional caregiver, and 9.1% in a nursing home. During the year following discharge, the mortality rate was 14.0%, the hospitalization rate 29.7%, and the emergency department revisit rate 59.3%. In the fully adjusted model, the risk of death was associated only with living in a nursing home (hazard ratio 1.366 (1.101-1.695)). On the other hand, the risk of hospitalization was lower in individuals living in nursing homes (hazard ratio 0.783 [0.676-0.907]) and at home with relatives (hazard ratio 0.897 [0.810-0.992]), while the risk of emergency department revisit was lower in individuals living in nursing homes (hazard ratio 0.826 [0.742-0.920]) or at home with caregivers (hazard ratio 0.856 [0.750-0.976]). The type of household was modestly associated with the one-year prognosis of patients ≥65years of age discharged after attendance at an emergency department. Living in a nursing home is associated with an increased risk of death but a decreased risk of rehospitalization or emergency department revisit, while living at home with relatives or professional caregivers is associated only with a decreased risk of hospitalization and emergency department revisit, respectively.

Inequities among patient placement in emergency department hallway treatment spaces

BackgroundLimited capacity in the emergency department (ED) secondary to boarding and crowding has resulted in patients receiving care in hallways to provide access to timely evaluation and treatment. However, there are concerns raised by physicians and patients regarding a decrease in patient centered care and quality resulting from hallway care. We sought to explore social risk factors associated with hallway placement and operational outcomes. Study design/methodsObservational study between July 2017 and February 2020. Primary outcome was the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of patient placement in a hallway treatment space adjusting for patient demographics and ED operational factors. Secondary outcomes included left without being seen (LWBS), discharge against medical advice (AMA), elopement, 72-h ED revisit, 10-day ED revisit and escalation of care during boarding. ResultsAmong 361,377 ED visits, 100,079 (27.7%) visits were assigned to hallway beds. Patient insurance coverage (Medicaid (aOR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01,1.06) and Self-pay/Other (1.08, (1.03, 1.13))) with comparison to private insurance, and patient sex (Male (1.08, (1.06, 1.10))) with comparison to female sex are associated with higher odds of hallway placement but patient age, race, and language were not. These associations are adjusted for ED census, triage assigned severity, ED staffing, boarding level, and time effect, with social factors mutually adjusted. Additionally adjusting for patients' social factors, patients placed in hallways had higher odds of elopement (1.23 (1.07,1.41)), 72-h ED revisit (1.33 (1.08, 1.64)) and 10-day ED revisit (1.23 (1.11, 1.36)) comparing with patients placed in regular ED rooms. We did not find statistically significant associations between hallway placement and LWBS, discharge AMA, or escalation of care. ConclusionWhile hallway usage is ad hoc, we find consistent differences in care delivery with those insured by Medicaid and self-pay or male sex being placed in hallway beds. Further work should examine how new front-end processes such as provider in triage or split flow may be associated with inequities in patient access to emergency and hospital care.

Abstract 16662: Factors Associated With Repeated Emergency Department Visits Among Symptomatic Patients With Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) is a prevalent cause of emergency department (ED) visits among adults. However, there is limited understanding of the characteristics of patients with HF who frequently utilize the ED for symptom management. Aim: To describe factors associated with ED revisits among symptomatic patients with chronic HF. Methods: We identified 1,472,083 adults (age ≥ 18 years) with HF who had no history of left ventricular assist device or heart transplantation between January 2010 and March 2020 from the TriNetX Research Network, which included 47 US healthcare organizations. In this retrospective observational study, 24,070 patients presenting with dyspnea and receiving intravenous (IV) Furosemide at the ED were followed up for 1 year from the index ED visit. ED revisits related to the treatment of dyspnea with IV diuretics were tracked. Factors associated with these ED revisits were identified using multivariate Cox regression analysis. Results: A total of 3,574 ED revisits were observed from 2,559 patients (10.6% of the sample, mean age 63 years, 51% men, 39% White, 62% Non-Hispanic). The ED revisit rates were 52, 96, 125, and 148 visits per 1,000 persons within 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. The median time to the first ED revisit for symptom management with IV diuretics was 65 days (range 2-364 days). In the Cox model, younger patients (&lt; 65 years) had a higher risk of ED revisits compared to older patients (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.50-1.82, p&lt;0.001). Men had a higher risk of ED revisits compared to women (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.02-1.23, p=0.02). Black patients had a higher risk of ED revisits compared to other races (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.20-1.53, p&lt;0.001). Patients with HFrEF (e.g., ICD-10 I50.2) had a higher risk of ED revisits compared to those with congestive HF (e.g., ICD-10 I50 without HF type information) (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.12-1.40, p &lt; 0.001). Patients diagnosed with HF more than 1 year prior to the index ED visit had a higher risk of ED revisits compared to those diagnosed within 1 year (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.19-1.44, p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: Younger age, male gender, Black race, HFrEF classification, and longer duration of HF were associated with ED revisits among symptomatic adults with HF. To reduce repeated ED visits, targeted interventions for high-risk patients are essential.

Safety and Feasibility of an Emergency Department-to-Outpatient Pathway for Patients With TIA and Nondisabling Stroke.

Evaluation of transient ischemic attack/nondisabling ischemic strokes (TIA/NDS) in the emergency department (ED) contributes to capacity issues and increasing health care expenditures, especially high-cost duplicative imaging. As an institutional quality improvement project, we developed a novel pathway to evaluate patients with TIA/NDS in the ED using a core set of laboratory tests and CT-based neuroimaging. Patients identified as 'low risk' through a safety checklist were discharged and scheduled for prompt outpatient tests and stroke clinic follow-up. In this prespecified analysis designed to assess feasibility and safety, we abstracted data from patients consecutively enrolled in the first 6 months. We compared data from 106 patients with TIA/NDS enrolled in the new pathway from April through September 2020 (age 67.9 years, 45% female), against 55 unmatched historical controls with TIA encountered from April 2016 through March 2017 (age 68.3 years, 47% female). Both groups had similar median NIHSS scores (pathway and control 0) and ABCD2 scores (pathway and control 3). Pathway-enrolled patients had a 44% decrease in mean ED length of stay (pathway 13.7 hours, control 24.4 hours, p < 0.001) and decreased utilization of ED MRI-based imaging (pathway 63%, control 91%, p < 0.001) and duplicative ED CT plus MRI-based brain and/or vascular imaging (pathway 35%, control 53%, p = 0.04). Among pathway-enrolled patients, 89% were evaluated in our stroke clinic within a median of 5 business days; only 5.5% were lost to follow-up. Both groups had similar 90-day rates of ED revisits (pathway 21%, control 18%, p = 0.84) and recurrent TIA/ischemic stroke (pathway 1%, control 2%, p = 1.0). Recurrent ischemic events among pathway-enrolled patients were attributed to errors in following the safety checklist before discharge. Our TIA/NDS pathway, implemented during the initial outbreak of COVID-19, seems feasible and safe, with significant positive impact on ED throughput and ED-based high-cost duplicative imaging. The safety checklist and option of virtual telehealth follow-up are novel features. Broader adoption of such pathways has important implications for value-based health care.

Social Navigation for Adolescent Emergency Department Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

PurposeAdolescent emergency department (ED) patients have unmet social needs that contribute to ED use. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of social needs navigation for adolescents on subsequent ED visits and community resource use and to identify characteristics associated with elevated social risk. MethodsBetween July 2017 and August 2019, we used a random date generator to establish intervention and control group enrollment dates. All adolescents completed a social needs survey. Adolescents enrolled on intervention dates received in-person, risk-tailored social needs navigation. Those enrolled on control dates received a preprinted resource guide. We used chart review and follow-up calls to assess 12-month ED revisits and community resource use. Logistic regression was used to compare these outcomes between groups. We measured the association between ≥3 reported unmet needs and characteristics hypothesized a priori to be associated with elevated social risk (nonurgent visits, obesity, or any of nine “socially sensitive” chief complaints) using logistic regression. ResultsA total of 399 adolescents were randomized. There was no difference between groups in the number of ED revisits. There was increased community resource use in the intervention group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 3.5 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.5, 8.2]). Adolescents with a socially sensitive chief complaint had increased odds of ≥3 unmet needs (aOR: 2.2 [95% CI: 1.3, 3.6]), as did those with food insecurity in a post hoc analysis (aOR: 9.9 [95% CI: 4.0, 24.6]). DiscussionSocial needs navigation increased community resource use but not subsequent ED visits. Adolescents with socially sensitive chief complaints or food insecurity reported increased unmet needs.

Reducing Overutilization of High-flow Nasal Cannula in Children with Bronchiolitis.

Bronchiolitis is a leading cause of pediatric hospitalizations. A high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) does not significantly improve clinical outcomes and is associated with increased costs and intensive care unit (ICU) utilization. Despite this, hospitals continue to overuse HFNC in children with bronchiolitis. We aimed to reduce HFNC initiation in children hospitalized with bronchiolitis by 20 percentage points within 6 months. This study included patients aged 1 month to 2 years diagnosed with bronchiolitis, excluding patients with prematurity less than 32 weeks or preexisting cardiopulmonary, genetic, congenital, or neuromuscular abnormalities. Measures included HFNC utilization, length of stay, length of oxygen supplementation (LOOS), ICU transfers, and emergency department (ED) revisits and readmissions. For our primary intervention, we implemented a HFNC initiation protocol incorporating a respiratory scoring system, a multidisciplinary care-team huddle, and an emphasis on supportive care. Staff education, electronic health record integration, and audit and feedback were used to support implementation. Statistical process control charts were used to track metrics. We analyzed 325 hospitalizations (126 baseline and 199 postintervention). The proportion of children hospitalized with bronchiolitis who received HFNC decreased from a mean of 82% to 60% within 1 month of implementation. Length of stay decreased from a median of 54 to 42 hours, and length of oxygen supplementation decreased from 50 to 38 hours. There were no significant changes in ICU transfers, 7-day ED revisits, or readmissions. Implementing a HFNC initiation protocol can safely reduce the overutilization of HFNC in children hospitalized with bronchiolitis.

A simplified scoring model for predicting bacteremia in the unscheduled emergency department revisits: The SADFUL score

Bacteremia is a severe complication of infectious disease. Patients with a high bacteremia risk in the emergency department (ED) but misidentified would lead to the unscheduled revisits. This study aimed to develop a simplified scoring model to predict bacteremia in patients with unscheduled ED revisits. Adult patients with unscheduled ED revisits within 72h with a final diagnosis of infectious disease were retrospectively included. The development cohort included patients visiting the ED from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021. Internal validation was performed in patients visiting the ED from January 1, 2022 to March 31, 2022. Variables including demographics, pre-comorbidities, triage levels, vital signs, chief complaints, and laboratory data in the index visit were analyzed. Bacteremia was the primary outcome determined by blood culture in either index visits or revisits. The SADFUL score for predicting bacteremia comprised the following predictors: "S"egmented neutrophil percentage (+3 points), "A"ge>55 years (+1 point), "D"iabetes mellitus (+1 point), "F"ever (+2 points), "U"pper respiratory tract symptoms (-2 points), and "L"eukopenia (2 points). The area under receiver operating characteristic curve with 95% confidence interval in the development (1802 patients, 190 [11%] with bacteremia) and the validation cohort (134 patients, 17 [13%] with bacteremia) were 0.78 (0.74-0.81) and 0.79 (0.71-0.88), respectively. The SADFUL score is a simplified useful tool for predicting bacteremia in patients with unscheduled ED revisits. The scoring model could help ED physicians decrease misidentification of patients at a high risk for bacteremia and potential complications.